Government\u2019s slow advance on its digital television set-top box roll out is holding back local hopes for faster, more widely available mobile internet, say experts.<\/p>\n
It\u2019s been almost a year since South Africa missed an International Telecommunication Union (ITU) deadline on June 17 2015 to switch over to digital broadcasts.<\/p>\n
This migration process, when completed, will move public broadcaster the SABC from analogue to digital terrestrial television (DTT) signals and open up digital dividend spectrum for faster mobile internet.<\/p>\n
Currently, mobile networks such as Vodacom have to refarm their existing spectrum to deliver faster LTE internet services, a process that limits their ability to widely roll out this service.<\/p>\n
Key to spurring on South Africa\u2019s digital migration process, though, is its subsidised TV set-top box tender, which will provide five million poorer households with access to digital channels.<\/p>\n
But the set-top box roll-out has faced years of delays amid broadcasters’ differences over whether these devices should or shouldn\u2019t have a control mechanism for encrypted signals.<\/p>\n
And just this week, upon a legal challenge from e.tv, Bloemfontein\u2019s Supreme Court of Appeal ruled that government\u2019s recent decision not to encrypt these boxes should be struck down.<\/p>\n
The court upheld e.tv\u2019s complaint that Communications Minister Faith Muthambi had failed to properly consult relevant parties before deciding not to encrypt these boxes.<\/p>\n
The North Gauteng High Court heard arguments last year, from the SABC and M-Net, that including encryption on these boxes would add extra costs to the subsidised roll-out.<\/p>\n
However, e.tv said an uncrypted signal would mean that \u201cnon-compliant\u201d set-top boxes would receive digital broadcasts while further preventing it from offering high definition broadcasts.<\/p>\n
Experts have also argued that unencrypted boxes could result in broadcasts being easily pirated, making it difficult for free-to-air broadcasters to secure rights to high quality content.<\/p>\n
Arthur Goldstuck, managing director of technology research firm World Wide Worx, told Fin24 that e.tv\u2019s victory could be positive and negative for South Africa\u2019s digital migration process.<\/p>\n
\u201cIt’s both a step forward and a step back,\u201d Goldstuck told Fin24.<\/p>\n
\u201cIt’s regrettable that it puts digital migration on hold once more, as the specs for the set-top boxes now need to be changed once again to require encryption capability.<\/p>\n
\u201cHowever, it’s also a step forward, as it allows for a more advanced platform to be distributed to all homes, opening up the possibility for new channels to be launched, and therefore greater potential for future migration from free TV to pay TV for those households that move up the income curve,\u201d Goldstuck added.<\/p>\n
Reverting back to former decisions?<\/strong><\/p>\n The SCA\u2019s decision further means that government may have to fall back on a 2014 decision by former Communications Minister Yunus Carrim to provide a control system on subsidised set-top boxes.<\/p>\n At the time, Carrim said broadcasters were allowed to choose whether they want to use an encrypted signal or not as the subsidised set-top boxes would have a generic control system.<\/p>\n “Hopefully we’re back to the policy that was initially sort of accepted by Cabinet …in 2014,\u201d the Democratic Alliance\u2019s shadow minister for telecommunications and postal services, Marian Shinn, told Fin24 by phone.<\/p>\n “Muthambi unilaterally amended that, and then the Cabinet was bamboozled into accepting it. So, if we just revert to that policy, we should probably be alright,\u201d added Shinn.<\/p>\n Shinn further told Fin24 that the decision to bolt encryption features to subsidised boxes would enable fairer competition among local broadcasters and help them to compete against pay-TV providers like Naspers owned MultiChoice.<\/p>\n “Most of them who actually are in the competitive space with broadcasters like Multichoice would actually encrypt their (signals) so that they can get decent quality programming,\u201d Shinn told Fin24.<\/p>\n “They would be able to procure better quality programming because producers of content would be satisfied that their material would not be pirated, thanks to the encryption.<\/p>\n “So, for a quality, competitive environment, the boxes needed to be encrypted,\u201d she added.<\/p>\n Mark Rosin, chief operating officer of e.tv, said in a statement on Tuesday that the SCA’s decision this week \u201callows the possibility of a strong and stable DTT platform to South African free-to-air television viewers offering the best local and international content.\u201d<\/p>\n Pay-TV provider Multichoice had previously sided with the SABC and Minister Muthambi in calling for unencrypted subsidised boxes.<\/p>\n Multichoice spokespeople, at the time of writing, were not ready to comment yet on e.tv\u2019s latest court victory.<\/p>\n \u201cWe\u2019ve noted the decision of the Appeal Court and are currently studying the judgment,\u201d Multichoice\u2019s general manager for corporate affairs, Jackie Rakitla, told Fin24 by email.<\/p>\n Process ‘moves forward’<\/strong><\/p>\n Meanwhile, Muthambi\u2019s office said that her department will continue with its digital migration process despite the SCA decision.<\/p>\n The department kick-started the roll out of set-top boxes to outlying areas in the Northern Cape last year. This year, the department has extended its roll-out to outlying areas in Limpopo.<\/p>\n \u201cThe SCA did not order the reversal of the digital migration process. What the SCA did is to clarify a technicality which was embedded in the 2015 amended policy,\u201d said the department in a statement.<\/p>\n But Shinn has explained that to date government has only managed to distribute encrypted set-top boxes.<\/p>\n “They’re rolling them out to the border areas which receive their signals from satellite transmitters not from the terrestrial transmitters,\u201d said Shinn.<\/p>\n “So, all those boxes are encrypted anyway because no satellite operator will receive signals that are not encrypted. By and large, the boxes that have gone out are encrypted boxes,\u201d Shinn added.<\/p>\n Other challenges that the department faces in rolling out set-top boxes include that government hasn\u2019t yet proffered budget for the entire process, said Shinn.<\/p>\n Need for high-speed internet<\/strong><\/p>\n Nevertheless, South Africa needs to go ahead with its digital migration process to open up frequencies for broadband.<\/p>\n \u201cThe importance of digital migration ranges from compliance with international standards in order to be good citizens of the world, through to the digital dividend of freeing up valuable spectrum that is ideal for high-speed broadband,\u201d Goldstuck told Fin24.<\/p>\n \u201cDigital broadcasting is more efficient, provides higher quality, and opens up capacity for far more channels, so it’s not a question of why, but of why not,\u201d Goldstuck added.<\/p>\n Shinn said the digital migration project will help those on SA\u2019s border to have access to internet.<\/p>\n “The freeing up of the spectrum would actually make more people in remote areas able to connect to the internet, it would bridge the digital divide. Those are the advantages of this,\u201d Shinn told Fin24.<\/p>\n “So, the longer we delay this, the more people in marginalised areas or underserviced areas are excluded from the information age,\u201d Shinn added.<\/p>\n *Fin24 is part of Media24 which is owned by Naspers.<\/em><\/p>\n Fin24<\/a><\/p>\n SEACOM strengthens position as Africa\u2019s leading Internet enabler<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n Best and worst mobile internet providers in SA<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n The SA province with the highest internet usage<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\nMore on SA internet<\/h3>\n