With global technology stocks enjoying strong returns, the big question is whether another tech bubble is brewing? While some market analysts say \u2018yes\u2019, Gerrit Smit, head of equity management at Stonehage Fleming has a different view.<\/p>\n
\u201cThe returns being produced in the technology sector are based on real organic growth that is occurring right now; not on the prospect of future growth, which was the case during the dot.com bubble of 1997 to 2001.\u201d<\/p>\n
Smit said that many of the major technology businesses are creating significant free cash flow currently, which is funnelled to shareholders through successful reinvestment or through dividends. \u201cThis is an important cornerstone of prudent, successful investing. Without free cash flow, shareholders have more uncertainty of future returns.\u201d<\/p>\n
During the dot.com bubble the free cash flow yield on the S&P 500 technology sector was less than 2%. Currently that figure is 4.9%, a ratio of more than double. Furthermore, the 12 month forward P\/E multiple in the dot.com bubble era was around 40, whereas now it is 19. \u201cIn both instances the valuations are half as expensive now as they were then,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n
In addition to strong free cash flow, Smit sees strong, sustainable, organic growth potential in many technology stocks, notably large-cap counters.<\/p>\n
In the current technology world, the focus is on big data and getting information as fast as possible to as many as possible all over the world through smart mobile devices.<\/p>\n
While Apple recently launched its new smartphone with a price tag of US$999, both India and China are producing models with comparable technology priced around US$100. This is making mobile technology and its many benefits accessible to more individuals than ever before, creating a sustainable growth path for well-managed companies that distribute their products through mobile technology.<\/p>\n
In the technology sector the clear way to monitor whether a company remains to be relevant is to follow its organic revenue growth. If this doesn\u2019t come through consistently, it implies that their technology is falling out of favour and the business may be in process of becoming extinct.<\/p>\n
In terms of individual technology stocks, the fund has positions in, Visa, Tencent, Alphabet, Accenture and PayPal. \u201cTencent is one of the world\u2019s most successful technology companies,\u201d Smit said.<\/p>\n
Using the metric of organic growth as a benchmark, Tencent reported in their last earnings announcement that their revenue line grew by over 50%. In addition, their compounded free cash flow growth over the past four years was over 33% per annum.<\/p>\n
Smit said Tencent\u2019s strength lies in having a number of different earnings drivers. Its social network business WeChat alone has over 900 million active users. Both a social media and messaging app, WeChat is also used for mobile e-commerce, payments, ordering food, taxis and more.<\/p>\n
Furthermore, Tencent has a stake in JD.com, China\u2019s version of Amazon, and in Didi, the country\u2019s version of Uber. \u201cImportantly, we are also comfortable with Tencent\u2019s overall corporate governance,\u201d Smit said.<\/p>\n
Turning to Visa, Smit said this technology giant supplies the platform on which all Visa transactions globally occur. Its growth potential is based on the fact that payments, whether consumer, corporate or institutional, occur more and more online.<\/p>\n
The mushrooming of e-commerce is adding further fuel to the company\u2019s growth potential.<\/p>\n
Alphabet is another outstanding business, Smit said. As the holding company of Google, Android and YouTube, it is also very active in AI, driverless cars and satellite communications; Alphabet\u2019s free cash flow growth has exceeded 17% per annum over the last four years.<\/p>\n
In addition to the high weighting in technology stocks, other investments include some of the world\u2019s best known companies such as Nestle, Est\u00e9e Lauder and PepsiCo where there is confidence in the sustainability for indefinite growth rather than volatile cyclical growth.<\/p>\n