{"id":32708,"date":"2013-03-04T10:19:48","date_gmt":"2013-03-04T08:19:48","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/businesstech.co.za\/news\/?p=32708"},"modified":"2013-03-04T10:24:14","modified_gmt":"2013-03-04T08:24:14","slug":"samsung-vs-apple-1-05-billion-payout-slashed","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/businesstech.co.za\/news\/hardware\/32708\/samsung-vs-apple-1-05-billion-payout-slashed\/","title":{"rendered":"Samsung vs Apple: $1.05 billion payout slashed"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Apple Inc had a major setback in its mobile patents battle with Samsung Electronics on Friday, as a federal judge slashed a $1.05 billion jury award by more than 40 percent and set a new trial to determine damages.<\/p>\n<p>Apple won the award last year against Samsung in what was the biggest and highest-profile of a number of legal trials around the world, centered on the use and alleged abuse of patents in a highly competitive mobile market.<\/p>\n<p>The iPhone maker convinced the jury that the Korean company, which in 2012 overtook Apple as the global smartphone leader, had infringed on its iPhone and iPad patents.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;We are pleased that the court decided to strike $450,514,650 from the jury&#8217;s award,&#8221; the Korean company said in a statement. &#8220;Samsung intends to seek further review as to the remaining award.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Apple declined to comment.<\/p>\n<p>Friday&#8217;s ruling by Judge Lucy Koh of the U.S. District Court Northern District of California in San Jose means the two mobile electronics companies may once again square off in a California court to decide how much of the $450.5 million struck from the damages, associated with 14 Samsung products, should stand.<\/p>\n<p>Koh said the jury had incorrectly calculated part of the damages and that a new trial was needed to determine the actual, final dollar amount. That could end up less than or more than the original $450.5 million set by the jury.<\/p>\n<p>Koh, rejecting Apple&#8217;s motion for an increase in the jury&#8217;s damages award, ordered a new trial on damages for the 14 devices, which include the Galaxy SII. The jury&#8217;s award to Apple for 14 other separate products, totaling almost $599 million, was maintained.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;The court has identified an impermissible legal theory on which the jury based its award and cannot reasonably calculate the amount of excess while effectuating the intent of the jury,&#8221; Koh said in her ruling.<\/p>\n<p>Apple and Samsung account for one in two mobile phones sold. They also rely on each other for components and business.<\/p>\n<p>Their legal tussle has been viewed as a proxy war between Apple and Google Inc as Samsung&#8217;s flagship Galaxy smartphones and tablets run on Google&#8217;s Android operating system.<\/p>\n<p>Shares in Apple closed down 2.5 percent at $430.47 on Nasdaq.<\/p>\n<h3 class=\"my-4\">More Samsung news<\/h3>\n<p><a title=\"Samsung dominates in global mobile phone sales\" href=\"http:\/\/businesstech.co.za\/news\/mobile\/26608\/samsung-dominates-in-global-mobile-phone-sales\/\"><strong>Samsung dominates in global mobile phone sales<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n<p><a title=\"Samsung SA shows off holiday wares\" href=\"http:\/\/businesstech.co.za\/news\/electronics\/25483\/samsung-sa-shows-off-holiday-wares\/\"><strong>Samsung SA shows off holiday wares<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n<p><a title=\"Samsung Galaxy smartphones propel quarterly profit\" href=\"http:\/\/businesstech.co.za\/news\/mobile\/23694\/samsung-galaxy-smartphones-propel-quarterly-profit\/\"><strong>Samsung Galaxy smartphones propel quarterly profit<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n<p><a title=\"Samsung pins $7.4 billion profit\" href=\"http:\/\/businesstech.co.za\/news\/electronics\/25166\/samsung-pins-7-4-billion-profit\/\"><strong>Samsung pins $7.4 billion profit<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Apple Inc had a major setback in its mobile patents battle with Samsung Electronics on Friday, as a federal judge slashed a $1.05 billion jury award by more than 40 percent and set a new trial to determine damages.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":7,"featured_media":19095,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[22],"tags":[25,51,371,365,5273],"class_list":["post-32708","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-hardware","tag-active","tag-apple","tag-lawsuit","tag-patents","tag-samung"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/businesstech.co.za\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/32708","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/businesstech.co.za\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/businesstech.co.za\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/businesstech.co.za\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/7"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/businesstech.co.za\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=32708"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/businesstech.co.za\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/32708\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":32725,"href":"https:\/\/businesstech.co.za\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/32708\/revisions\/32725"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/businesstech.co.za\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/19095"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/businesstech.co.za\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=32708"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/businesstech.co.za\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=32708"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/businesstech.co.za\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=32708"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}