{"id":38293,"date":"2013-05-21T14:01:35","date_gmt":"2013-05-21T12:01:35","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/businesstech.co.za\/news\/?p=38293"},"modified":"2013-05-22T09:27:01","modified_gmt":"2013-05-22T07:27:01","slug":"the-most-valuable-brands-in-the-world","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/businesstech.co.za\/news\/trending\/38293\/the-most-valuable-brands-in-the-world\/","title":{"rendered":"The most valuable brands in the world"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a title=\"BrandZ\" href=\"http:\/\/businesstech.co.za\/forum\/showthread.php\/8596-BrandZ\">BrandZ<\/a> has revealed the most valuable brands in world for 2013, showing that tech giant, <a title=\"Apple\" href=\"http:\/\/businesstech.co.za\/forum\/showthread.php\/1648-Apple\">Apple<\/a>, has retained its position at numner 1.<\/p>\n<p>According to BrandZ, the top 100 global brands have increased their total value by 9% to a whopping US$2.6 trillion, compared to the flat growth (1%) seen in 2012.<\/p>\n<p>South Africa&#8217;s <a title=\"MTN Group\" href=\"http:\/\/businesstech.co.za\/forum\/showthread.php\/1640-MTN-Group\">MTN Group<\/a> topped the list as the highest ranked African brand\u00a0at 79th, having boosted its value by 23% and climbing 9 places with a brand value of US$11.448 billion.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Modest recovery in developed economies, particularly in the US, drove the positive change in BrandZ 2013. And, despite slower economic expansion, the BRICs continued to propel certain categories, especially luxury,&#8221; the report said.<\/p>\n<p>BrandZ noted that brand value had increased in every category except for technology and oil and gas, which declined slightly.<\/p>\n<p>Despite the decline, however, technology remained the dominant sector, with the top 3 most highly-valued brands coming from the tech field.<\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_38296\" style=\"width: 593px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><a  data-lightbox=\"post-image\" href=\"http:\/\/businesstech.co.za\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/05\/Category-changes.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-38296\" class=\"size-full wp-image-38296\" alt=\"Category changes\" src=\"http:\/\/businesstech.co.za\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/05\/Category-changes.png\" width=\"583\" height=\"564\" srcset=\"https:\/\/businesstech.co.za\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/05\/Category-changes.png 583w, https:\/\/businesstech.co.za\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/05\/Category-changes-300x290.png 300w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 583px) 100vw, 583px\" \/><\/a><p id=\"caption-attachment-38296\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Category changes<\/p><\/div>\n<h3 class=\"my-4\">The best in tech<\/h3>\n<p>Apple increased its brand value by 1% to US$185.071 billion to claim the number one spot, while Internet giant, <a title=\"Google\" href=\"http:\/\/businesstech.co.za\/forum\/showthread.php\/1719-Google\">Google<\/a>, boosted its value by 5% to US$113.669 billion to take second place.<\/p>\n<p>International Business Machines (<a title=\"IBM\" href=\"http:\/\/businesstech.co.za\/forum\/showthread.php\/1700-IBM-International-Business-Machines\">IBM<\/a>) &#8211; the former number 2 &#8211; lost 3% of brand value in 2013 and fell to third place at US$112.536 billion.<\/p>\n<p>The world&#8217;s largest Software company, <a title=\"Microsoft\" href=\"http:\/\/businesstech.co.za\/forum\/showthread.php\/1715-Microsoft\">Microsoft<\/a>, slipped two position on the list to 7th, having lost 9% of brand value over the year to US$69.814 billion.<\/p>\n<p>Telecoms companies in the top 10 managed to boost brand value significantly, with <a title=\"AT&amp;T\" href=\"http:\/\/businesstech.co.za\/forum\/showthread.php\/1634-At-amp-t\">AT&amp;T<\/a> being the top operator with a brand value of US$75.507 billion &#8211; an increase of 10% &#8211; gaining two places to 6th overall.<\/p>\n<p>The only other telecoms operator in the top 10 is <a title=\"China Mobile\" href=\"http:\/\/businesstech.co.za\/forum\/showthread.php\/5963-China-Mobile\">China Mobile<\/a>, which boosted brand value by 18% to US$55.368 billion at 10th place.<\/p>\n<p>Global brands such as McDonalds (4th), Coca-Cola (5th), Marlboro (8th) and Visa (9th) round off the non-tech companies listed in the top 10.<\/p>\n<h3 class=\"my-4\">Top 10 most valuable global brands<\/h3>\n<div class=\"table-responsive\"><table class=\"table\" width=\"100%\" border=\"1\" cellspacing=\"0\" cellpadding=\"5\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td valign=\"top\" bgcolor=\"#CCCCCC\"><strong>#<\/strong><\/td>\n<td valign=\"top\" bgcolor=\"#CCCCCC\"><strong>Brand<\/strong><\/td>\n<td valign=\"top\" bgcolor=\"#CCCCCC\"><strong>Change<\/strong><\/td>\n<td valign=\"top\" bgcolor=\"#CCCCCC\"><strong>Value (US$bn)<br \/>\n<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>1<\/td>\n<td>Apple<\/td>\n<td>1%<\/td>\n<td>185.071<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>2<\/td>\n<td>Google<\/td>\n<td>5%<\/td>\n<td>113.669<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>3<\/td>\n<td>IBM<\/td>\n<td>-3%<\/td>\n<td>112.536<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>4<\/td>\n<td>McDonalds<\/td>\n<td>-5%<\/td>\n<td>90.256<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>5<\/td>\n<td>Coca-Cola<\/td>\n<td>6%<\/td>\n<td>78.415<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>6<\/td>\n<td>AT&amp;T<\/td>\n<td>10%<\/td>\n<td>75.507<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>7<\/td>\n<td>Microsoft<\/td>\n<td>-9%<\/td>\n<td>69.814<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>8<\/td>\n<td>Marlboro<\/td>\n<td>-6%<\/td>\n<td>69.383<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>9<\/td>\n<td>Visa<\/td>\n<td>46%<\/td>\n<td>56.060<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>10<\/td>\n<td>China Mobile<\/td>\n<td>18%<\/td>\n<td>55.368<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table><\/div>\n<h3 class=\"my-4\">Top 20 most valuable global tech brands<\/h3>\n<div class=\"table-responsive\"><table class=\"table\" width=\"100%\" border=\"1\" cellspacing=\"0\" cellpadding=\"5\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td valign=\"top\" bgcolor=\"#CCCCCC\"><strong>#<\/strong><\/td>\n<td valign=\"top\" bgcolor=\"#CCCCCC\"><strong>Brand<\/strong><\/td>\n<td valign=\"top\" bgcolor=\"#CCCCCC\"><strong>Change<\/strong><\/td>\n<td valign=\"top\" bgcolor=\"#CCCCCC\"><strong>Value (US$bn)<br \/>\n<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>1<\/td>\n<td>Apple<\/td>\n<td>1%<\/td>\n<td>185.071<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>2<\/td>\n<td>Google<\/td>\n<td>5%<\/td>\n<td>113.669<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>3<\/td>\n<td>IBM<\/td>\n<td>-3%<\/td>\n<td>112.536<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>6<\/td>\n<td>AT&amp;T<\/td>\n<td>10%<\/td>\n<td>75.507<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>7<\/td>\n<td>Microsoft<\/td>\n<td>-9%<\/td>\n<td>69.814<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>10<\/td>\n<td>China Mobile<\/td>\n<td>18%<\/td>\n<td>55.368<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>11<\/td>\n<td>General Electric<\/td>\n<td>21%<\/td>\n<td>55.357<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>12<\/td>\n<td>Verizon<\/td>\n<td>8%<\/td>\n<td>53.004<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>14<\/td>\n<td>Amazon<\/td>\n<td>34%<\/td>\n<td>45.727<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>17<\/td>\n<td>Vodafone<\/td>\n<td>-8%<\/td>\n<td>39.712<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>19<\/td>\n<td>SAP<\/td>\n<td>34%<\/td>\n<td>34.365<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>21<\/td>\n<td>Tencent<\/td>\n<td>52%<\/td>\n<td>27.273<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>27<\/td>\n<td>Deutsche Telekom<\/td>\n<td>-11%<\/td>\n<td>23.893<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>30<\/td>\n<td>Samsung<\/td>\n<td>51%<\/td>\n<td>21.404<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>31<\/td>\n<td>Facebook<\/td>\n<td>-36%<\/td>\n<td>21.261<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>33<\/td>\n<td>Baidu<\/td>\n<td>-16%<\/td>\n<td>20.443<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>36<\/td>\n<td>Oracle<\/td>\n<td>-11%<\/td>\n<td>20.039<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>47<\/td>\n<td>ebay<\/td>\n<td>40%<\/td>\n<td>17.749<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>53<\/td>\n<td>Accenture<\/td>\n<td>2%<\/td>\n<td>16.503<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>54<\/td>\n<td>Hewlett-Packard<\/td>\n<td>-29%<\/td>\n<td>16.362<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table><\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>BrandZ has revealed the most valuable brands in world for 2013, and tech brands come out on top.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":10,"featured_media":38294,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[51,137,5897,1874,53,26,753,169,4307],"class_list":["post-38293","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-trending","tag-apple","tag-att","tag-brandz","tag-china-mobile","tag-google","tag-headline","tag-ibm","tag-microsoft","tag-top-brands"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/businesstech.co.za\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/38293","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/businesstech.co.za\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/businesstech.co.za\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/businesstech.co.za\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/10"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/businesstech.co.za\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=38293"}],"version-history":[{"count":8,"href":"https:\/\/businesstech.co.za\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/38293\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":38300,"href":"https:\/\/businesstech.co.za\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/38293\/revisions\/38300"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/businesstech.co.za\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/38294"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/businesstech.co.za\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=38293"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/businesstech.co.za\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=38293"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/businesstech.co.za\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=38293"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}