South Africa\u2019s government is planning more measures to bolster its ailing building industry after banning the use of imported cement on state construction projects.<\/p>\n
\u201cGovernment is undertaking research across a range of construction-related products where there appears to be significant potential for localisation,\u201d Stephen Hanival, chief economist at the Department of Trade, Industry and Competition, said in an emailed response to questions. \u201cFurther announcements will be made in due course.\u201d<\/p>\n
The country\u2019s preferential procurement policy framework enables the department to designate sectors for localisation in line with national development and industrial policy goals.<\/p>\n
While the government has pursued localisation since 2014, it has become more strategic since the advent of the pandemic with business, government and labor groups agreeing on an initial list of 42 products and sub-sectors that should be prioritized, Hanival said.<\/p>\n
An Oct. 11 directive issued by the National Treasury that aims at ensuring locally produced cement is used for state projects sent shares in leading producer PPC Ltd. to their highest level since 2019.<\/p>\n
It was the first of its kind since president Cyril Ramaphosa touted localisation last year as a key strategy to revive an economy hard-hit by the coronavirus pandemic.<\/p>\n
Localisation is seen as an approach to boost output, revive the domestic manufacturing industry and create jobs in an economy that contracted the most in at least 27 years in 2020 due to Covid-19 restrictions and where more than a third of the workforce is unemployed.<\/p>\n
Manufacturing\u2019s contribution to gross domestic product declined to 11.8% in 2020, from 19.2% in 1994, when the ruling African National Congress came to power, World Bank data shows.<\/p>\n
South Africa spends about a quarter of its national wealth on buying foreign goods every year and has an \u201cover-propensity\u201d to import products that could otherwise be domestically produced, the DTIC said in May.<\/p>\n
The nation\u2019s recovery plan also targets local production of a range of other products, including consumer and capital goods, and car and rail components.<\/p>\n
\u201cSuch policies would benefit small companies that have not only been hard hit by the pandemic, but also need customers such as government to sustain them,\u201d said Thabi Leoka, an independent economist. \u201cIf localisation involves large monopolies being given government contracts, then it\u2019s misplaced.\u201d<\/p>\n
The localisation drive will run alongside six so-called Master Plans aimed at supporting the domestic poultry, sugar, automobile, furniture, steel and metal fabrication, and clothing, textile, footwear and leather sectors.<\/p>\n
Together, the industries account for about 6% of GDP and 700,000 jobs, according to the DTIC.<\/p>\n
Localisation isn\u2019t a panacea and may have \u201cadverse economic consequences\u201d by creating monopolies, reducing competition, increasing the costs of doing business and weakening incentives for productivity and innovation\u201d said Peter Leon, a partner and Africa co-chair at law firm Herbert Smith Freehills LLP.<\/p>\n
Policies that create barriers to cross-border flows of goods and services could contravene South Africa\u2019s international trade obligations and could result in its commercial partners seeking recourse, he said.<\/p>\n