Flexible work arrangements are the new normal at some South African companies, but managers are still hesitant to embrace the shift.<\/p>\n
Linda Trim, a director at workplace design consultancy Giant Leap, said that offices are still returning to pre-Covid occupancy levels and smaller towns have new residents taking advantage of avoiding the daily commute – making remote work and hybrid work firmly part of South African corporate life.<\/p>\n
Trim said that if the ‘work from anywhere’ experiment could arguably be successful for veteran employees in defined roles with trusted colleagues, for many employees and certain objectives, remote work remains \u201ca big problem to be solved”.<\/p>\n
\u201cFirstly, remote work is worse for new workers<\/strong>,\u201d said Trim. \u201cMany inexperienced employees joining a remote virtual company realise they haven\u2019t joined much of a company at all. They have joined little more than a group video chat.\u201d<\/p>\n Many of the perks of flexible work – like managing your own time – can work against younger employees in companies that entrench mentorship programmes.<\/p>\n \u201cThis is partially true of South Africa, where we have such a skills shortage and an urgent need to transfer skills to younger workers,\u201d said Trim.<\/p>\n Secondly, remote or hybrid work is much worse for building new teams<\/strong> to take on new tasks.<\/p>\n A 2021 survey by Microsoft with researchers at California\u2019s Berkley University that studied 60,000 anonymous employees’ messages and chats found that the number of messages within teams grew significantly as workers tried to keep up with their colleagues – but information sharing actually plummeted.<\/p>\n Remote working made people more likely to hunker down with their pre-existing teams and far less likely to have conversations that could lead to knowledge sharing, said Trim.<\/p>\n \u201cThe study showed that while people could still manage the \u2018hard work of emailing and making spreadsheets from anywhere, the most important part of the office is the \u2018soft work\u2019 – the chat and informal interactions that build long-term trust and is fundamental to company innovation.\u201d<\/p>\n Other studies have reached a similar conclusion.<\/p>\n Earlier this year, researchers from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and UCLA used smartphone geolocation data and matched it to patent citations for individual firms, said Trim.<\/p>\n \u201cThey concluded that the first with the most face-to-face interactions also had the most patent citations clearly showing that innovation happens in person.<\/p>\n Thirdly, and closely related, remote work is much worse for generating new ideas<\/strong>.<\/p>\n Research by Columbia Business School and Stanford Graduate School of Management used 1,500 engineers to analyse whether virtual teams could brainstorm as creatively as in-person teams.<\/p>\n \u201cEngineers who worked virtually created fewer total ideas, and external assessors ranked their ideas significantly less creative than those of in-person teams,” said Trim.<\/p>\n \u201cSuccessful collaboration requires trust and a kind of intimacy that\u2019s hard to build on a Zoom call,\u201d Trim noted.<\/p>\n \u201cThe remote work debate has become deeply polarising between those who consider it a necessity beyond criticism and those who consider it a culture and innovation killer. But it certainly is worth noting what the research says.”<\/p>\n
\n