{"id":627904,"date":"2022-09-23T08:45:52","date_gmt":"2022-09-23T06:45:52","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/businesstech.co.za\/news\/?p=627904"},"modified":"2022-09-23T08:45:52","modified_gmt":"2022-09-23T06:45:52","slug":"shell-gas-exploration-in-south-africa-case-heads-back-to-court","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/businesstech.co.za\/news\/business-opinion\/627904\/shell-gas-exploration-in-south-africa-case-heads-back-to-court\/","title":{"rendered":"Shell gas exploration in South Africa &#8211; case heads back to court"},"content":{"rendered":"<p class=\"m_3550821106314502326paragraph\"><span lang=\"EN-GB\">Coastal communities and NGOs must return to court as Shell, Impact Africa, and the minister of Mineral Resources and Energy seek leave to appeal the judgment that stopped Shell and Impact Africa\u2019s unlawful oil and gas exploration right off the ecologically sensitive Wild Coast. <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"m_3550821106314502326paragraph\"><span lang=\"EN-GB\">The Wild Coast communities and environmental NGOs that recently won a landmark judgment setting aside the exploration right that enabled Shell to conduct seismic survey explorations for oil and gas off the ecologically sensitive Wild Coast must return to court following the lodging of three applications for leave to appeal. <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"m_3550821106314502326paragraph\"><span lang=\"EN-GB\">On 20 September, Impact Africa lodged an application for leave to appeal the Makhanda High Court ruling, and the Minister of Minerals and Energy and Shell lodged similar applications today (22 September). <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"m_3550821106314502326paragraph\"><b><span lang=\"EN-GB\">The judgment <u><\/u><u><\/u><\/span><\/b><\/p>\n<p class=\"m_3550821106314502326paragraph\"><span lang=\"EN-GB\">The judgment of three judges of the Eastern Cape High Court on 1 September 2022 found that the granting of the exploration right and its implications had not been made known to affected communities and that \u201cthe mere ticking of a checklist\u201d did not constitute meaningful consultation. <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"m_3550821106314502326paragraph\"><span lang=\"EN-GB\">The court set aside the decision to grant the exploration right on the basis that it was procedurally unfair, but also noted that it failed to pass muster on several other grounds, including the failure to take account of relevant information, including climate change and the right to food, a failure to take account of the Integrated Coastal Management Act (ICMA), and the failure to comply with various legal requirements such as the requirement to create opportunities for historically disadvantaged people to participate in the minerals and petroleum industries.<\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"m_3550821106314502326paragraph\"><span lang=\"EN-GB\"> The court found that the Department of Minerals and Energy had failed to consider the communities\u2019 spiritual and cultural rights and their rights to livelihood, the potential climate change implications, and the anticipated harm to the marine and bird life along the Eastern Cape coast. <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"m_3550821106314502326paragraph\"><span lang=\"EN-GB\">It held that Impact and Shell bore the onus of showing that the precautionary principle should not be applied when experts differed on whether the adverse impacts of the seismic surveys were adequately mitigated.\u00a0 <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"m_3550821106314502326paragraph\"><b><span lang=\"EN-GB\">The applicants <u><\/u><u><\/u><\/span><\/b><\/p>\n<p class=\"m_3550821106314502326paragraph\"><span lang=\"EN-GB\">The application was brought by Wild Coast residents and fishers, the Dwesa-Cwebe Communal Property Association, and the NGOs Sustaining the Wild Coast NPC and All Rise Attorneys, who were represented by the\u202fLegal Resources Centre and\u202fRichard Spoor Attorneys.\u00a0 <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"m_3550821106314502326paragraph\"><span lang=\"EN-GB\">They were joined by Natural Justice and Greenpeace Africa, represented by environmental law firm,\u202fCullinans and Associates, which had launched the first application to interdict the seismic survey. <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"m_3550821106314502326paragraph\"><b><span lang=\"EN-GB\">Grounds of appeal <\/span><\/b><u><\/u><u><\/u><\/p>\n<p class=\"m_3550821106314502326paragraph\"><span lang=\"EN-GB\">Shell, Impact Africa and the minister are seeking leave to appeal on various grounds. Notable, they argue that the public had been properly notified of the decision to grant the exploration right and that the court should not have allowed the decision to be challenged so long after it was made. <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"m_3550821106314502326paragraph\"><span lang=\"EN-GB\">They also argue that the court was wrong to deal with exploration as a step in a single process that culminates in the production and combustion of oil and gas and was incorrect in applying the precautionary principle to the expert evidence on the harms of seismic surveys. <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"m_3550821106314502326paragraph\"><span lang=\"EN-GB\">Shell also argues that the court was wrong to conclude that the public statements made by Minister Mantashe gave rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias and that lodging an appeal to him would have been an exercise in futility. <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"m_3550821106314502326paragraph\"><span lang=\"EN-GB\">\u201cSeismic blasting poses an immediate threat to South Africa\u2019s rich marine life, but the eventual extraction and use of oil and gas likely to follow such exploration will have even more profound impacts.\u00a0 It would be critical to focus instead on renewable and natural energy sources and leave the oil in the ground and the gas beneath the sea,&#8221; said Cullinan and Associates attorney, Ricky Stone.\u00a0 <\/span><\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p><strong>Read: <a href=\"https:\/\/businesstech.co.za\/news\/business\/621953\/shell-gas-exploration-struck-down-in-south-africa\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Shell gas exploration struck down in South Africa<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Oil giant Shell, Impact Africa, and energy minister Gwede Mantashe have on Thursday (22 September) applied for leave to appeal a court ruling that had blocked a seismic survey off the Wild Coast.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":10,"featured_media":320224,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[17428,26,2239],"class_list":["post-627904","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-business-opinion","tag-cullinan-and-associates","tag-headline","tag-shell"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/businesstech.co.za\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/627904","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/businesstech.co.za\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/businesstech.co.za\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/businesstech.co.za\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/10"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/businesstech.co.za\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=627904"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/businesstech.co.za\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/627904\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":627920,"href":"https:\/\/businesstech.co.za\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/627904\/revisions\/627920"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/businesstech.co.za\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/320224"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/businesstech.co.za\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=627904"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/businesstech.co.za\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=627904"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/businesstech.co.za\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=627904"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}