{"id":70697,"date":"2014-10-12T00:05:26","date_gmt":"2014-10-11T22:05:26","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/businesstech.co.za\/news\/?p=70697"},"modified":"2014-10-10T15:32:14","modified_gmt":"2014-10-10T13:32:14","slug":"the-worlds-most-valuable-brands-in-2014","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/businesstech.co.za\/news\/trending\/70697\/the-worlds-most-valuable-brands-in-2014\/","title":{"rendered":"The world&#8217;s most valuable brands in 2014"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Tech companies dominate Interbrand&#8217;s list of most valuable brands in 2014, with electronics giant, Apple, leading overall with a brand value of US$119 billion.<\/p>\n<p>Out of the top 100 brands in 2014, 13 companies are from the tech sector &#8211; 8 of which are in the top 20, overall, and 5 in the top 10.<\/p>\n<p>The tech category grew 11.3% year-over-year, and collectively is worth US$493.2 billion in brand value, according to the report.<\/p>\n<p>Apple continued to dominate the brand value rankings in 2014, after displacing Coca Cola as the world&#8217;s most valuable brand in 2013.<\/p>\n<p>Google &#8211; the world&#8217;s second most valuable brand &#8211; also remained in place.<\/p>\n<p>Facebook (29th, +86%), Apple (1st, +21%), and Google (2nd, +15%) represent the fastest growing brands &#8211; though saw growth slow down, compared to previous years.<\/p>\n<p>According to Interbrand, Facebook &#8220;continues to exceed expectations&#8221; &#8211; much in thanks to its massive Q2 earnings and mobile ad business.<\/p>\n<p>Another stand-out tech company is Amazon, the group said, with strong growth in its core business, as well as its expansion an innovation to other areas.<\/p>\n<p>On the other side of the coin, Finnish communications and information technology provider Nokia (#98, -44%) experienced the largest decline in value among the top 100 brands, dropping from its #57 position in 2013 to #98 this year.<\/p>\n<p>Japanese consumer electronics company Nintendo (100th, -33%) also had another difficult year and saw its brand fall 33 places to 100th position, with a brand value of US$4.1 billion.<\/p>\n<h3 class=\"my-4\">The world&#8217;s most valuable brands<\/h3>\n<div class=\"table-responsive\"><table class=\"table\" border=\"1\" width=\"100%\" cellspacing=\"0\" cellpadding=\"5\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td valign=\"top\" bgcolor=\"#CCCCCC\"><strong>#<\/strong><\/td>\n<td valign=\"top\" bgcolor=\"#CCCCCC\"><strong>Brand<\/strong><\/td>\n<td valign=\"top\" bgcolor=\"#CCCCCC\"><strong>Value<\/strong><\/td>\n<td valign=\"top\" bgcolor=\"#CCCCCC\"><strong>Change<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>1<\/td>\n<td>Apple<\/td>\n<td>$118.9 billion<\/td>\n<td>21%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>2<\/td>\n<td>Google<\/td>\n<td>$107.4 billion<\/td>\n<td>15%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>3<\/td>\n<td>Coca Cola<\/td>\n<td>$81.6 billion<\/td>\n<td>3%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>4<\/td>\n<td>IBM<\/td>\n<td>$72.2 billion<\/td>\n<td>-8%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>5<\/td>\n<td>Microsoft<\/td>\n<td>$61.2 billion<\/td>\n<td>3%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>6<\/td>\n<td>GE<\/td>\n<td>$45.5 billion<\/td>\n<td>-3%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>7<\/td>\n<td>Samsung<\/td>\n<td>$45.4 billion<\/td>\n<td>15%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>8<\/td>\n<td>Toyota<\/td>\n<td>$42.4 billion<\/td>\n<td>20%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>9<\/td>\n<td>McDonald&#8217;s<\/td>\n<td>$42.2 billion<\/td>\n<td>1%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td>10<\/td>\n<td>Mercedes-Benz<\/td>\n<td>$34.3 billion<\/td>\n<td>8%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table><\/div>\n<p>Interbrand determines its ranking by looking at three components in its valuations: an analysis of the financial performance of the branded products or services; the role the brand plays in purchase decisions; and the brand&#8217;s competitive strength.<\/p>\n<p>The group also draws on data from Thomson Reuters, company annual reports, Datamonitor and Twitter, on top of its own desk research and &#8220;expert panel assessment&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>The full listing can be found on <a title=\"http:\/\/bestglobalbrands.com\/\" href=\"http:\/\/bestglobalbrands.com\/\" target=\"_blank\">Interbrand&#8217;s dedicated site<\/a>.<\/p>\n<h3 class=\"my-4\">More on brands<\/h3>\n<p><strong><a title=\"Permalink to Online retailers climb in brand value\" href=\"http:\/\/businesstech.co.za\/news\/internet\/55482\/online-retailers-climb-in-brand-value\/\" rel=\"bookmark\">Online retailers climb in brand value<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong><a title=\"Permalink to South Africa\u2019s favourite brands\" href=\"http:\/\/businesstech.co.za\/news\/general\/64476\/south-africas-favourite-brands\/\" rel=\"bookmark\">South Africa\u2019s favourite brands<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong><a title=\"Permalink to These are South Africa\u2019s most valuable brands\" href=\"http:\/\/businesstech.co.za\/news\/general\/63541\/south-africas-most-valuable-brands\/\" rel=\"bookmark\">These are South Africa\u2019s most valuable brands<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong><a title=\"Permalink to The world\u2019s biggest brands\" href=\"http:\/\/businesstech.co.za\/news\/international\/58173\/the-worlds-biggest-brands-revealed\/\" rel=\"bookmark\">The world\u2019s biggest brands<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Tech companies dominate Interbrand&#8217;s list of most valuable brands in 2014, with electronics giant, Apple, leading overall with a brand value of US$119 billion.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":10,"featured_media":39854,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[51,7726,8500,53,26,4308],"class_list":["post-70697","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-trending","tag-apple","tag-brand-value","tag-brands","tag-google","tag-headline","tag-interbrand"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/businesstech.co.za\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/70697","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/businesstech.co.za\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/businesstech.co.za\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/businesstech.co.za\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/10"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/businesstech.co.za\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=70697"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/businesstech.co.za\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/70697\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":70707,"href":"https:\/\/businesstech.co.za\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/70697\/revisions\/70707"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/businesstech.co.za\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/39854"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/businesstech.co.za\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=70697"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/businesstech.co.za\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=70697"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/businesstech.co.za\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=70697"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}