Further expansion of Value Added Tax (VAT) free \u2013 or zero-rated \u2013 products is currently not on the cards for South Africa. However, the government has implemented more targeted policies to benefit the poor.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
This is according to Deputy Minister of Finance, David Masondo, who was participating in Parliament\u2019s mini plenary session on, amongst other topics, the high cost of living and measures the government is taking to alleviate it.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Masondo told the session that additional VAT zero rating is not \u201cthe best instrument to address the problem of high cost of living\u201d.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\u201cGovernment has already VAT zero rated a number of basic foods. This includes the zero-rating of illuminating paraffin and other items, which was introduced in April 2001. Studies subsequently showed that suppliers did not pass on the benefit of the VAT relief to the consumers as it was intended. So it doesn\u2019t follow that zero rating will lead to lower prices.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\u201cThe tax revenue that is lost from zero-rated food items mostly flows to higher income households because this category\u2026purchase more of the products that are zero-rated.<\/strong> In fact, many analysts have demonstrated that in absolute (monetary) terms, middle and higher income households benefit more from the zero-rating than lower income or poor households,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Currently, VAT constitutes 26%, on average, of gross tax revenue in South Africa. That revenue is redistributed to the poor through various government programmes including social grants.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Masondo says a reduction in this revenue would have an impact on those who benefit from state-driven programmes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u201cProducts that are zero-rated are well targeted. Further zero rating will lead to VAT revenue loss<\/strong>, which could be directed to the already existing pro-poor government programmes. Targeted cash transfer to the poor is better and more redistributive as opposed to VAT, which benefits mostly high-income households.<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u201cIn 2019\/2020 fiscal year, R31 billion VAT revenue was forgone due to zero-rated items. So we think that further zero rating will lead to the decline of revenue which could be used to support the poor,\u201d Masondo said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n The Deputy Minister emphasised that although zero-rating some items is well intended and necessary, \u201ca social transfer system of assisting the poor through targeted expenditure interventions is much more desirable and better\u201d.<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u201cRecognising that zero rating is not the best instrument, the government has instead implemented a number of policies to directly benefit lower-income households through the expenditure side. Education and health budgets are progressive and extensive grant system of old age grants, the child support grant and the disability grant provide cash to households who are most in need.<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u201cThe Social Relief of Distress grant\u2026is another new mechanism that the government has used to provide this relief. This is a better approach than zero rating where so much of the benefit goes to higher earners and where companies may not even pass on the benefit to the consumers,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Masondo doubled down on his position \u2013 thrashing out other targeted interventions to assist cash strapped South Africans.<\/p>\n\n\n\n These include:<\/p>\n\n\n\n \u201cThis shows that the government has been active in finding solutions to try and combat high prices without resorting to further zero rating,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n
\n\n\n\n