{"id":860662,"date":"2026-05-18T14:03:15","date_gmt":"2026-05-18T12:03:15","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/businesstech.co.za\/news\/?p=860662"},"modified":"2026-05-18T14:03:43","modified_gmt":"2026-05-18T12:03:43","slug":"huge-win-for-doctors-and-private-healthcare-in-south-africa","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/businesstech.co.za\/news\/government\/860662\/huge-win-for-doctors-and-private-healthcare-in-south-africa\/","title":{"rendered":"Huge win for doctors and private healthcare in South Africa"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>The Constitutional Court of South Africa has axed Sections 36 to 40 of the National Health Act, declaring them unconstitutional.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The sections in question deal with the government&#8217;s &#8220;Certificate of Need&#8221;, which is a licensing system for healthcare providers in the country.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>At its core, the certificate acted as a mandate for where healthcare facilities and healthcare providers could operate or expand.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>It advanced the state&#8217;s aim of ensuring &#8220;equitable distribution&#8221; of medical resources nationwide, but also limited practitioners&#8217; freedom of choice in where they could operate.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Under the scheme, a certificate needed to be obtained to establish, construct, modify, acquire or continue to operate a health establishment or agency in the country.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>This extended to acquiring health technology or providing prescribed health services.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Power was given to the Director-General to consider whether or not to grant such a certificate, especially looking at &#8220;equitable distribution&#8221; of health services.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Opponents of the scheme characterised the certificate as one of the pillars of state control over healthcare, and a core component of the state&#8217;s National Health Insurance scheme.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Trade Union Solidarity explained that the certificate would have given the state the near absolute power to determine which healthcare practitioners may practice where and which services may be provided.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Operating without a certificate would have constituted an offence, with violators at risk of a fine or five years&#8217; imprisonment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>However, the Constitutional Court has now severed the sections of the Act relating to the certificate.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Victory for healthcare workers<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-large\"><a  data-lightbox=\"post-image\" href=\"https:\/\/businesstech.co.za\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/South-Africa-hospital.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1024\" height=\"683\" src=\"https:\/\/businesstech.co.za\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/South-Africa-hospital-1024x683.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-701865\" srcset=\"https:\/\/businesstech.co.za\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/South-Africa-hospital-1024x683.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/businesstech.co.za\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/South-Africa-hospital-300x200.jpg 300w, https:\/\/businesstech.co.za\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/South-Africa-hospital-768x512.jpg 768w, https:\/\/businesstech.co.za\/news\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/07\/South-Africa-hospital.jpg 1200w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1024px) 100vw, 1024px\" \/><\/a><\/figure>\n\n\n\n<p>The Constitutional Court ruling follows a High Court ruling in 2024.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The High Court ruled that the certificate was not rational, and failed to account for the constitutional rights of owners of private health establishments, service providers and workers.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The court also found the scheme to be procedurally irrational and lacking safeguards, violating several constitutional rights.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>In the matter brought by Solidarity, the Hospital Association of South Africa (HASA) and the Alliance of South African Independent Practitioners\u2019 Associations, the litigants sought confirmation from the ConCourt.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The ConCourt confirmed the findings.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>&#8220;The High Court&#8217;s declaration that the impugned provisions were invalid was confirmed, and the cross-appeal was dismissed,&#8221; it said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>&#8220;The certificate of need scheme is not rationally connected to the objective of ensuring transformation and a more equitable distribution of health services,&#8221; the court said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>It added that the powers of the Minister and the Director-General of Health are not sufficiently constrained when issuing certificates of need and dealing with all other aspects of the scheme.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>&#8220;The certificate of need scheme unjustifiably limits the right to choose one\u2019s profession, occupation or trade freely.&#8221;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Anton van der Bijl, Deputy Chief Executive of Solidarity, said the ruling has toppled one of the central pillars of the NHI.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The NHI similarly aims to centralise state control over healthcare, while giving the Minister of Health immense and sweeping power to alter the country&#8217;s healthcare systems.<br>\u00a0<br>\u201cThe Certificate of Need was far more than merely an administrative instrument. It was an instrument of centralisation and state control,&#8221; Van der Bijl said.<br>\u00a0<br>\u201cToday the court said that South Africans are not state property and professionals are not pawns of the government.&#8221;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Van der Bijl says the ruling should ensure that &#8220;no government can force doctors, dentists, nurses and other healthcare practitioners through regulations to create quality healthcare where the government itself has failed.&#8221;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Constitutional Court has axed the Certificate of Need in South Africa, dealing a major blow to the government&#8217;s plan to force healthcare providers to work where it wants.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":10,"featured_media":818210,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[23],"tags":[4168,2902,1632],"class_list":["post-860662","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-government","tag-concourt","tag-constitutional-court","tag-solidarity"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/businesstech.co.za\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/860662","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/businesstech.co.za\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/businesstech.co.za\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/businesstech.co.za\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/10"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/businesstech.co.za\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=860662"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/businesstech.co.za\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/860662\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":860665,"href":"https:\/\/businesstech.co.za\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/860662\/revisions\/860665"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/businesstech.co.za\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/818210"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/businesstech.co.za\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=860662"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/businesstech.co.za\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=860662"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/businesstech.co.za\/news\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=860662"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}