The 9 best and worst run municipalities in South Africa

 ·29 Mar 2017
Municipality

Treasury has released its state of local government finances and financial management report for the fourth quarter of the 2015/16 financial year, detailing how the country’s municipalities spend taxpayers money.

The report reviews the state of municipal budgets and expenditure as well as municipal governance issues at the end of a particular financial year in order to:

  • Identify areas of risk in local government finances so that appropriate policy responses can be developed.
  • Identify those municipalities that are in financial distress so that processes can be initiated to determine the full extent of their financial problems and whether a municipality requires support.

Explanation of results

In order to determine the correct use of budgets, the report looks at 8 different categories including how much money the municipality uses to meet its operating expenditure requirements; overspending and under-spending of allocated budgets; how many debtors owe money to the municipality and the municipalities’ ability to generate its own funds.

The report then graded the categories on a 1-3 scale and tallied the total to an amount out of a possible 24.

  • 1 – Good
  • 2 – Fair
  • 3 – Poor
  • ≥16 – a municipality shows signs of distress (receiving a score of 3 in more than 4 of the 8 indicators listed in the tables below)

Performance of metros

Municipality Cash coverage Cash Balances Reliance on Capital Grants Overspending operational Underspending Capital Debtors Growth Debtors own revenue (%) Creditors Cash (%) >=16
Nelson Mandela Bay 2 1 2 1 2 1 3 1 12
Ekhuruleni 1 1 2 1 2 1 3 1 11
Johannesburg 2 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 12
Tshwane 3 1 2 1 1 1 3 3 15
eThekwini 2 1 2 1 x 1 3 3 12
Cape Town 1 1 2 1 2 1 3 1 11
Buffalo City 1 1 1 1 2 1 3 1 10
Mangaung 2 1 1 1 2 3 3 1 13

Worst performing municipalities

Municipality Cash coverage Cash Balances Reliance on Capital Grants Overspending operational Underspending Capital Debtors Growth Debtors own revenue (%) Creditors Cash (%) >=16
Nketoana (FS) 3 3 3 3 3 2 3 1 21
King Sabata Dalindyebo (EC) 3 3 3 x 3 3 3 1 19
Emfuleni (GT) 3 1 3 x 3 3 3 3 19
Maluti-a-Phofung (FS) 3 3 3 x 3 3 3 1 19
Impendle (KZN) 2 3 3 2 2 3 3 1 19
Ba-Phalaborwa (LIM) 3 3 3 x 2 2 3 3 19
Thabazimbi (LIM) 3 3 3 x 3 3 3 1 19
Ditsobotla (NW) 3 2 3 x 3 2 3 3 19
Ngaka Modiri Molema (DC) 3 1 3 2 3 3 1 3 19

Best performing municipalities

Municipality Cash coverage Cash Balances Reliance on Capital Grants Overspending operational Underspending Capital Debtors Growth Debtors own revenue (%) Creditors Cash (%) >=16
Mthonjaneni (KZN) 1 1 2 x x 1 1 1 7
West Coast (DC) 1 1 1 x x 3 1 1 8
Swartland (WC) 1 1 1 2 x 2 1 1  9
Cape Winelands (DC) 1 1 1 2 x 2 1 1  9
Overberg (DC) 2 1 1 x x 3 1 1  9
Intsika Yethu (EC) 2 1 3 x x 1 1 1 9
Phokwane (NC) 1 1 1 1 x 2 3 1 10
Saldanha Bay (WC) 1 1 1 x 2 1 3 1 10
Central Karoo (DC) 2 1 1 x 3 1 1 1  10

Read: ANC mayor buys R1.1 million luxury SUV in municipality on the verge of financial collapse

Show comments
Subscribe to our daily newsletter