These are South Africa’s best and worst life insurers

The latest South African Customer Satisfaction Index (SA-csi) for life insurance shows who has the most satisfied customers in the country.

Life insurers face their biggest battleground yet in South Africa – a heavily constrained economy, high unemployment, a growing burden of disease and technology and distribution disruption that is upending traditional channels.

Added to this, changing customer expectations, social media and citizen journalism can quickly amplify an adverse experience – rightly or wrongly – when a dissatisfied customer feels they have been treated unfairly or when trust is breached.

It’s these experiences that feed into the latest SA-csi for Life Insurance conducted by Consulta. The index provides highly scientific insights into the overall level of satisfaction of customers of South Africa’s major life insurers – 1Life Insurance, Absa Life, Discovery Life, FNB Life, Liberty, Metropolitan, Momentum, Old Mutual and Sanlam.

In the 2018 SA-csi for Life Insurance, FNB Life clinched the top spot with SA’s most satisfied customers. Metropolitan still registered above industry average, whilst Old Mutual, Sanlam, Absa Life, 1Life Insurance and Discovery Life all follow on par, while Liberty and Momentum are below industry par.

All insurers showed some decline on the previous year’s index scores with the exception of Discovery and Sanlam.

Customer Satisfaction

FNB Life leads the pack at 83.7 and well above the industry par of 78.3. Metropolitan follows also in an above industry average position with 81.1. Both FNB Life and Metropolitan increased their overall satisfaction index scores compared with 2017 – a notable achievement considering they were operating off a high base which is typically challenging to improve upon, said Consulta.

Old Mutual (79.6), Sanlam (79.2), Absa Life (78.2), 1Life Insurance (77.7) and Discovery Life (76.8) all follow on par.

Liberty (73.8) and Momentum (72.9) follow below par and with a significant gap between their closest competitors. Both insurers have faced a three-year downward trend in customer satisfaction scores.

Customers have high expectations given that life insurance is a product they or their families will possible need at some point in future where an unforeseen crisis arise either as a result of death, disability or illness, Consulta said.

Touch points with customers are also low in frequency and depth of real engagement until claims time, when a customer gets to experience whether the insurer delivers on promises and expectations.

“It’s also the most emotionally fraught time. One of the big take-outs from the research is that as a whole, the industry needs to address the common misperception that insurers will look for reasons not to pay claims,” Consulta said.

“It’s a perception that is simply not backed by the facts if you consider that the Association for Savings and Investment South Africa (Asisa) released the statistics for long-term insurance claims made during 2018, showing that life insurers paid out R15.1 billion in death benefits to beneficiaries and policyholders during the year – equivalent to 99.3% of the value of all claims made,” said professor Adré Schreuder, SA-csi founder and chairperson.

“The percentage of claims that were repudiated or escalated to the ombud amounts to just 0.7%. It was very revealing to note the impact that recent news reports on claims rejections like that of the Nathan Ganas case, Liberty’s cyber hack in 2018, and various other claims rejections reported in the life ombud annual report have had on the public image of life insurers.

“During the field research, SA-csi respondents mentioned ‘trust’ and ‘delivering on promises’ as their key satisfaction criteria – significantly ahead of cost.”

A new model beyond compliance only?

“In an industry that is run on numbers and statistics, it is easy to overlook the fact that at the end of it all, a human being is involved whose life and livelihood is affected by the decisions made. Context matters for South African consumers and following the letter of the law is simply not enough.

“Tough decisions can no longer be made based on numbers only, without giving deep consideration to the human element, goodwill and doing the right and fair thing,” said Schreuder.

An interesting aspect of the SA-csi for Life Insurance 2018 is that the top performing brand for the last two years – FNB Life – is a bancassurance provider and not a traditional life insurer. Bancassurance – the process of selling insurance products through banking channels – has been growing rapidly despite being a relatively new player in the South African insurance space.

Other key findings from the SA-csi for Life Insurance 2018 include:

Perceived Value

Perceived value is a measure of the quality, relative to the price paid. FNB Life leads on perceived value by a significant margin against all competitors with 87,1 compared with the industry par of 79.2 and has improved with 3,3 index points compared with 2017. Metropolitan (81.6) and Old Mutual (80.6) follow also in above industry average positions.

1Life (80.2), Absa Life (79.9) and Sanlam (79.5) are on par. Discovery Life (76.4), Liberty (75.6) and Momentum (74) all score well below the rest of the industry. Discovery has the biggest gap between price-quality alignment with a margin of -6.1, meaning that customers don’t believe the quality of the cover and benefits warrant the price paid, said the report.

Complaints Incidence and Resolution

Of the complaint incidence across all brands, customers complained most often about Fees and cost 14%, problems and issues 9%, response time 8% and personal contact 7%.

It is notable that customers who highlighted communication, response time and personal contact as their key complaints also have the lowest overall satisfaction scores – indicating that these are significant points of contention for customers, said Schreuder.

In terms of complaints incidence and handling, FNB has a complaint incidence score of 7.9% which is lower than the industry average of 8.2% and an extraordinary complaint handling score of 75.6 which is leaps ahead of industry par (45.7). By global standards, a score above 50/100 is considered world-class.

Metropolitan follows with a 6.8% complaint incidence and the second highest complaint handling score index of 56.7.

It is clear that FNB Life and Metropolitan have prioritised this aspect of their business models, which is testimony of their leadership in having South Africa’s most satisfied customers, Schreuder said.

Sanlam has the lowest complaint handling score of 33.8 which signifies a marked decline in its previous year’s score of 57.3. Absa Life follows at 39.2 and Momentum at 41.4 – both below par (45.7).

Customer Loyalty

FNB Life has the highest percentage of loyal customers at 72.1% and above the industry par of 64.8%, the report found. FNB Life has increased its customer loyalty score of 71 in 2017 and is the only brand to have done so. All other brands have shown a decline in customer loyalty, its authors said.

Momentum has the lowest score of 57.9% followed by Liberty at 58.6%. Momentum’s customer loyalty score has been declining for five consecutive years, dropping 16.4% from 74.3% in 2014. Liberty has seen a 16.5% decline from 75.1% in 2014.

Customer loyalty across the sector has declined from a high of 73.6% in 2014 to 64.8% in 2018.

Treating Customers Fairly (TCF)

The degree to which customers feel they are being treated fairly by their insurer is highest with FNB Life (87.6) well above industry par of 80.2, followed by Absa Life (81.5), Old Mutual (81.5), Sanlam (81), 1Life Insurance (81) and Metropolitan (80.8) – all above par.

Discovery Life (78.6) and Liberty (77.5) come in below par, while Momentum comes in significantly below par (74.4) with the lowest score.

Read: Your new life under South Africa’s NHI

Must Read

Partner Content

Show comments

Trending Now

Follow Us

These are South Africa’s best and worst life insurers