The Financial Sector Conduct Authority (FSCA) issued a draft declaration of crypto assets as a financial product in late November, which falls under the Financial Advisory and Intermediary Services Act (FAIS).
The draft declaration proposes to alter the definition of a “financial product” in the country, to include “any other product similar in nature to any financial product” for the purposes of the Act.
The FSCA has specifically taken the view that crypto assets are similar in nature to some of the other financial products as defined under the FAIS Act, and the draft declaration therefore proposes to declare crypto assets as a financial product for purposes of the Act.
According to legal firm, Norton Rose Fulbright, while the draft declaration serves to better regulate crypto assets and crypto asset service providers (CASPs) in the country, it is a broad measure that doesn’t get into the finer regulation of the sector – and importantly, “in no way legitimises or gives credence to crypto assets”.
“The draft declaration is the result of lengthy consideration on how best to regulate crypto assets by the National Treasury, the SARB, the FSCA, and the Financial Intelligence Centre each in their individual capacities, and also as members of the Intergovernmental Fintech Working Group and the subsequently established Crypto Assets Regulatory Working Group,” said Desiree Reddy, director in the Banking & Finance Practice, Norton Rose Fulbright.
In its 2019 Consultation Paper on Crypto Assets, the working group highlighted the challenges in regulating crypto assets and also makes various policy recommendations relating to the regulation of the crypto assets environment, she said.
The draft declaration is intended to give effect to two particular recommendations:
- That the specified services rendered in respect of crypto assets must be included in the definition of ‘financial services’ , and also that ‘services related to the buying and selling of crypto assets must be included in the licensing activities under the Conduct of Financial Institutions Bill. The FSCA is, however, of the view that as an interim solution to address some of the immediate consumer risks, a similar outcome can be achieved in a more expeditious manner by declaring crypto assets as a financial product under the FAIS Act.
- That the FSCA should become the responsible authority for the licensing of ‘services related to the buying and selling of crypto assets, and should develop specific conduct standards for these services.
The general effect of the draft declaration is that any CASP or person giving advice or rendering intermediary services in relation to crypto assets must be authorised under the FAIS Act as a financial services provider (FSP), and as such must comply with all the requirements under the FAIS Act.
These parties are also beholden to the requirements of the General Code of Conduct for Authorised Financial Services Providers and Representatives, and the Determination of Fit and Proper Requirements, Reddy said.
Once registered as a FSP, a CASP may in turn become subject to the requirement to register as an accountable institution in keeping with the requirements of Schedule 1 of the Financial Intelligence Centre Act, 2001.
As an accountable institution, a CASP will need to comply with various anti-money laundering requirements, including the identification and verification of clients and the reporting of suspicious transactions.
Further communication regarding the proposed framework for regulating crypto assets under the FAIS Act, will follow.
“This may entail a separate code of conduct for crypto assets or a combination of leveraging on existing legislation and issuing exemptions, for example, a general exemption from the requirements contained the General Code and F&P Requirements, to the extent that these are found to be inappropriate in the context of crypto assets,” Reddy said.
Existing CASPs may continue their operations, but must submit an application for authorisation as an FSP under section 8 of the FAIS Act within 4 months of the effective date of the final declaration.
The business will be allowed to continue its operations until its application for a licence has been granted or declined. If such business fails to submit an application within 4 months, it must cease its operations.
Any new business that wants to start furnishing financial services in relation to crypto assets, after the effective date of the final declaration, will have to obtain an FSP licence before it can start furnishing such services.
While the draft declaration points to a move to legitimise crypto assets in the country, Reddy warns that this is not the case.
“In the context of the broader developments surrounding crypto assets the draft declaration is intentionally limited in scope as to only capture advice and intermediary services in respect of crypto assets,” she said.
“The draft declaration will not cover the full scope of potential CASP activities. Broader developments surrounding crypto assets will likely be given effect through the Conduct of Financial Institutions Bill (COFI) which will constitute the future consolidated legal framework governing the conduct of financial institutions.
“The COFI Bill will as part of its activity-based approach capture advice and a variety of intermediary type services in relation to crypto assets as licensing activities. It is also proposed that the COFI Bill will repeal the FAIS Act, meaning that the declaration, if made, will ultimately be collapsed into the COFI Bill framework,” she said.
The extent to which the exchange control regulations prohibit or regulate crypto assets will still apply notwithstanding the draft declaration, Reddy said, adding that South African residents must continue to ensure compliance to applicable exchange control requirements notwithstanding any licensing of CASP activities
“The declaration in no way legitimises or gives credence to crypto assets,” Reddy said.