SA Labour Court finds quotas unlawful

The Labour Court in Johannesburg this week found that the use of a quota system in the workplace is unlawful, according to trade union, Solidarity.

The judgment, Solidarity said, was handed down in its case against the Tshwane Municipality over unfair discrimination.

Among other things, Judge Faan Coetzee found that the municipality was inflexible when it had repeatedly overlooked Jan Pretorius, a water audit officer, for promotion.

The court also found the municipality’s appointment policy, in terms of which Pretorius was discriminated against purely based on race and gender, amounts to a quota system which is inconsistent with the Employment Equity Act.

In terms of the judgment, the municipality has to promote and remunerate Pretorius retrospectively, Solidarity said.

Solidarity chief executive Dr Dirk Hermann said that in its judgment, the court pointed out that the municipality’s appointment policy was based purely on numbers without any measurable targets.

“Therefore, it amounts to the subjective exclusion of individuals from the non-designated group. The judgment makes it clear that government departments that do not have employment equity plans cannot hide behind policy documents that do not have proper employment equity and measurable targets,” he said.

Hermann said he believes the judgment is unique as it is the first time that a court has found that a white male was unfairly discriminated against as a result of a quota system.

“The court found that it was unlawful to fill posts purely on the basis of the national race demography or even to leave posts vacant at the expense of suitably qualified white males. The court also found that the municipality had no legal grounds to exclude a suitably qualified candidate from the interviewing process. In addition, they did not take into account that the position required a scarce skill,” Hermann said.

Solidarity said that the judgment confirmed that numerical targets in employment equity plans or policies must take a variety of factors into account.

“This judgment thus sets the necessary legal grounds for future lawsuits on cases of unfair discrimination against individuals from the non-designated group as a result of quotas,” Hermann said.

Background to the case:

According to Solidarity, due to the colour of his skin, Pretorius, who has been working for the Department of Water and Sanitation since 1999, was overlooked for promotion when he applied for the position of foreman: trades in August 2012, and again in July 2013, notwithstanding the fact that a panel had selected him as the most suitable candidate for the position.

The municipality did not have an approved employment equity plan at the time.

The post Pretorius had initially applied for in 2012 was again advertised in July 2013. For a second time Pretorius applied for it but this time he was not invited to an interview nor was he shortlisted.

After Pretorius had lodged a grievance with the municipality in this regard he was informed in October 2014 that ‘no white person could be considered for the position’.

In May 2013 the Tshwane Municipality adopted an employment equity plan backdated for the period 1 July 2012 to 30 June 2017.

Pretorius was not appointed to the position he had applied for apparently based on this plan. The plan contains a resolution which stipulates that no white person may be appointed to the said position.

More on transformation

Questions over racial quotas at SA universities

DA to introduce recruitment targets based on race

SA court may be forced to decide who suffered more under Apartheid

Must Read

Partner Content

Show comments

Trending Now

Follow Us

SA Labour Court finds quotas unlawful