Naspers doesn’t have another genie in the bottle: opinion

Naspers’s conglomerate discount is widening. Its one-third stake in Tencent Holdings alone is now worth 27% more than the South African internet company’s entire market cap.

After a 70% increase in its stock so far this year, Tencent is valued at a whopping 54 times earnings, almost twice the 30 times for Google’s owner, Alphabet.

Why don’t investors prefer Naspers? The Cape Town-based company is still trading at a more reasonable 36 times profit.

Much of Tencent’s gain has been driven by Chinese investors. Over the last month alone, mainlanders bought a net HK$6 billion ($767 million) or so of the shares through the Hong Kong Shanghai Stock Connect.

Their stake in the Shenzhen-based company has risen to 1.3%, from just 0.8% five months ago.

One could argue that foreign investors are more skeptical, and expect Tencent’s shares to correct after its second-quarter earnings, due later Wednesday.

More likely, though, they suspect Naspers is a one-trick pony.

The South African company’s $32 million investment in Tencent, in 2001, was the deal of the century: That stake is now valued at $128 billion.

But Naspers doesn’t have another genie in the bottle.

Its biggest disposal was the $3.3 billion sale of a Poland-based online auction site, Allegro, last year. Naspers bought the company in 2008 for $1.6 billion, making the annual return a relatively unimpressive 10%.

If we strip out Tencent’s numbers, Naspers has been bleeding cash in its core operations for two straight years.

Unless it can show earnings from other holdings can outpace those from Tencent, investors may think it just got lucky.

Currently, there’s no way for Naspers to monetize its stake in the Chinese company except by selling it.

Tencent hands out hardly any cash – its dividend payout ratio is only 12.4%.

So why doesn’t Naspers offload some of its Tencent shares?

Naspers is a hoarder, quite unlike a venture-capital fund that typically trades in and out of technology assets every five to seven years.

Since 2005, the company has spent $8.2 billion buying stakes from Russia’s largest classified website to India’s most prominent e-commerce provider.

But disposals have been few and far between: A total of $4.9 billion, of which $3.3 billion was Allegro.

Some would say it’s sensible to retain a strategic stake in one of the world’s seven biggest technology companies. Even from a high base, Tencent is expected to increase earnings by 27% annually over the next three to five years, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.

Owning Tencent puts Naspers in the same league as SoftBank Group, which has a broader base of technology investments.

Precisely because of this over-reliance on Tencent, Naspers needs to show it’s running on more than luck. Otherwise, that valuation discount won’t close.

This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of Bloomberg LP and its owners.


Read: Naspers earnings soar as revenue climbs to $14.6 billion

 

Latest news

Partner Content

Show comments

Follow us

Recommended

Naspers doesn’t have another genie in the bottle: opinion