28 SA media companies face prosecution for alleged price fixing

Twenty-eight media companies have been referred to the Competition Tribunal for prosecution on charges of price fixing and the fixing of trading conditions, in contravention of the Competition Act.

The matter relates to an investigation that was initiated in 2011 which found that, through the Media Credit Co-Ordinators (MCC), various media companies agreed to offer similar discounts and payment terms to advertising agencies that place advertisements with MCC members.

MCC accredited agencies were offered a 16.5% discount, while non-members were offered 15%.

In addition, the Commission found that the implicated companies, through MCC, employed services of an intermediary company called Corexalance to perform risk assessments on advertising agencies for purposes of imposing a settlement discount structure and terms on advertising agencies.

The Commission found that the practices restricted competition among the competing companies as they did not independently determine the discounts and thereby fixed the price and trading terms in contravention of the Competition Act.

In referring the matter to the Tribunal for prosecution, the Commission seeks an order declaring that the media companies contravened the Act and are liable to pay penalties in terms of the Act.

The media companies are:

  1. SABC
  2. Media 24
  3. Primedia
  4. Mail & Guardian
  5. Avusa Media
  6. Mtv Networks Africa
  7. Media 24 Magazines
  8. Primedia Outdoor
  9. Cinemark
  10. Comutanet
  11. Conde Nast Independent Magazine
  12. The Citizens
  13. Spark Media
  14. Apurimac Media
  15. Provantage Media
  16. Radmark
  17. Carpe Diem Media
  18. Rodale And Touchline
  19. Mandla-Matla Publishing
  20. Ramsay Media
  21. Lugan Investments
  22. Associated Media
  23. Associated Hearst
  24. Capro
  25. Trudon
  26. United Stations
  27. Continetal Outdoor
  28. Media Credit Coordinators

Meanwhile, Independent Media (Independent), Caxton & CTP Publishers and Printers Limited (Caxton) and DStv Media Sales (DStv Media Sales) have admitted to the charges in relation to this same matter. Among others, the media companies agreed to pay administrative penalties as part of separate settlement agreements with the Commission:

  • Caxton agreed to pay R5,806,890.14
  • Independent agreed to pay R2,220,603; and
  • DStv Media Sales agreed to pay R22,262,599.

The companies also agreed to contribute towards the Economic Development Fund over the next three years. The Fund seeks to develop black owned small media or advertising agencies that require assistance with start-up capital and will assist black students with bursaries to study media or advertising, among others. It will be managed by the Media Development and Diversity Agency.

Caxton will pay R2.1 million; Independent will pay R799,417; and DStv Media Sales will pay R8 million.

“This is one of the legacy media practises that survived the introduction of the Competition Act in South Africa. It is a problem because it consolidates operations of a few media houses that gang up against mainly small advertising agencies.

“It is encouraging that some media houses have settled the matter and will also be directly contributing towards promoting the entry of small and black advertising agencies,” said Competition Commissioner, Tembinkosi Bonakele.

Read: DStv Media Sales hit with R180 million fine for price fixing


Must Read

Partner Content

Show comments

Trending Now

Follow Us

28 SA media companies face prosecution for alleged price fixing