Ending Covid vaccine mandates at work in South Africa – what you should know

A growing number of businesses in South Africa are weighing up the decision to continue with mandatory Covid vaccine policies or abandon them altogether.

This issue is currently governed by the ‘Code of Practice: Managing Exposure to SARS-COV-2 in the Workplace’, which took effect after the national state of disaster was brought to an end on 5 April, says Jacqui Reed, senior associate at Herbert Smith Freehills.

The Code of Practice replaced the previous Direction on Occupational Health and Safety Measures in Certain Workplaces, which was in effect from 11 June 2021 to 4 April 2022, she said.

“Both the code and the direction make provision for the implementation of a mandatory vaccination policy by an employer, provided certain procedures are followed, i.e. conducting a risk assessment and developing a plan based on that risk assessment.

“If the risk assessment indicates that it would be appropriate to implement a mandatory vaccination policy, then the employer is obliged to consult with the relevant stakeholders,” she said.

“Once the consultation period has concluded and the employer is comfortable that it would be appropriate having considered the employees’ submissions relating to the implementation of the policy, to implement the policy, then it may do so.”

It will then be required to deal with individual objections to the policy and assess whether the objection is valid and whether it is possible to reasonably accommodate the employee. In circumstances where there is no valid objection, the employee may be dismissed, she said.

Regardless of the status of the code, which is still in effect, employers and employees remain obliged to comply with the Occupational Health and Safety Act and ensure a safe and healthy working environment as far as reasonably practicable, Reed said.

“Employers are permitted to introduce policies and procedures in accordance with their operational requirements and doing so does not constitute a change to an employee’s terms and conditions of employment.

“Insofar as the mandatory vaccination policy, the law provided for an extensive consultation process before implementation, which is not the norm for all policies and procedures in the workplace. Given the sensitivity of the issue, the requirement to conduct an extensive consultation process is understandable and reasonable.”

Questions to ask

While the code does not make provision for consultation in the event that the mandatory vaccination policy is no longer applicable, Reed said it would be prudent for an employer to conduct a consultation process prior to doing so for the following reasons:

• There remains an obligation on the employer to maintain and provide a safe and healthy working environment. If an employer implemented the vaccination policy on the basis that it is required to provide a safe and healthy working environment, it would need to be able to justify why it now believes the mandatory vaccination policy is not necessary in light of that obligation. It may be able to do so if the majority of the workforce is vaccinated and the number of employees who have become seriously ill or have died since its implementation has reduced significantly as a direct result of its high vaccination rate;

• There have been employees who have been dismissed for refusing to comply with a mandatory vaccination policy. The employer may need to be able to distinguish those employees and circumstances from current circumstances in the event that further disputes arise;

• Provision is made in the Code for employees to refuse to work in the event that circumstances arise which, with reasonable justification, appear to the employee/health and safety representative to pose an imminent or serious risk of their exposure to Covid-19.

Can an employee refuse to work where the mandatory vaccination policy has been withdrawn?

In circumstances where an employee refused to work on the basis that a withdrawal of the policy will result in an unsafe working environment, it would be important to be mindful of clause 15 of the code which provides that employees may refuse to work in the event that circumstances arise which, with reasonable justification, appear to the employee/health and safety representative to pose an imminent or serious risk of their exposure to Covid-19, Reed said.

“An employee who refuses to work is to inform the employer who must then consult with the appropriate stakeholders and endeavour to resolve the dispute. If it cannot be resolved, the employer is required to notify the inspector within 24 hours and advise the employee and relevant stakeholders that the inspector has been notified.

“The effect of this provision is that where an employee can justify his/her refusal to work because the removal of the mandatory vaccination policy poses an imminent or serious risk of exposure, the employer will need to be able to provide a valid justification for its reasons for removal of the mandate.”

Read: New research shows why graduates can’t find work in South Africa