Big problem for public schools in South Africa

 ·5 Mar 2026

TPN Credit Bureau’s data shows that address fraud is a major problem facing South African public schools.

In one surveyed school, 40% of applications contained false or misleading address information. Another school saw fraudulent addresses in 20% of Grade 1 applications.

Door-to-door verifications at a separate school showed that 51% of applicants did not live at the address submitted.

“These figures point to a systemic issue, one that directly undermines lawful feeder zone admissions and deprives local learners of their rightful places,” said Ashleigh Laurent and Marissa Badenhorst from TPN Credit Bureau.

Feeder zones are geographic catchment areas used by provincial education departments to manage demand and prioritise learners living near a school.

The department also looks at siblings who have enrolled at the school or parents who work nearby.

Their goal is not to bar learners from applying outside the permitted zone, but to guide the admissions process.

While independent schools operate under different rules and may set their own admission criteria, public schools have to apply feeder zones fairly, as per constitutional obligations.

Public schools are barred from discriminating based on race, language, religion, citizenship, or financial status.

The Constitution states that every child has the right to basic education, including undocumented learners. Entrance exams and arbitrary admission conditions are also prohibited.

However, schools are entitled to verify applications. Parents will need to submit valid proof of residence. Checks are essential in ensuring fairness when demand exceeds a school’s capacity.

Parents can do this via municipal utility bills, lease agreements, title deeds, sworn affidavits, or employer letters where work proximity is claimed.

A criminal offence

Laurent and Badenhorst said that the legal consequences of falsifying information have become more severe.

Amendments to the Basic Education Laws Amendment (BELA) Act formally criminalised dishonest conduct in school applications.

The Act makes it an offence to knowingly submit false or misleading information, or to present forged documents or documents as true copies when they are not.

The Gauteng Department of Education said applications with falsified information can be disqualified, and that parents may be charged with fraud.

In response to altered documents, schools have begun conducting home visits and database cross-checks. In one case, over half of the addresses did not match the actual residency.

“The outcome is that learners who genuinely live within feeder zones are displaced, while others endure long daily commutes to maintain a false claim,” said the experts.

Crucially, submitting false information puts one at risk of rejection, cancellation of admission after placement and criminal liability.

Parents who believe an admission decision is unlawful must use a formal appeal process. For those who genuinely relocate after an offer is made, transparency is key.

“Informing the school of a change of address is far safer than attempting to conceal it. Cooperation with verification measures, including home visits, helps avoid disputes later,” said the experts.

“Parents should also be cautious of individuals claiming they can secure placement at specific schools for a fee. Education authorities have repeatedly warned that such schemes are fraudulent.”

Schools also need to apply policies consistently and without discrimination, and verification is a necessary part of this responsibility. Many thus use the TPN Credit Bureau to verify data.

Show comments
Subscribe to our daily newsletter